In times when everyone is complaining about everything, it does not seem strange that so many people complain why the news do focus only on particular countries (see e.g. the editorial in the latest issue of “The Week”). There are currently 195 countries in the world. Not only our time capacity would not allow us to follow the news on all different parts of the world, but also our brains would explode with so much information.
We live in a time when memory and remembrance have become social issues, with Alzheimer’s posing a serious challenge to technologically advanced societies. With the weakening of our memories we have also unlearned to compare, evaluate, and value. Everyone who regularly and carefully follows the news should know that nowhere else the news are so diverse as in Western countries, not only in the range of countries they cover but also regarding the variety of topics. In 2017, when I was doing my master’s degree in Sociology, I had a module on ethnicity together with a few Chinese overseas students. In their presentations they told us that they had never heard of the word and the concept of “racism”. One of them tried to write her essay on “racism in China”, and though she had online access to many Chinese university libraries, she could only find 3-4 useless papers in Chinese about racism, as she reported us. This example points out the state of media in China and many other countries where the media is (owned and) controlled by the government.
The fast pace of modern everyday lives and the excessive use of modern technologies such as smartphones, internet and social media, do not leave much time for “thinking”. One of the valuable aspects of social media is that they have advanced the status of their users from mere consumers to some kinds of producers. But this has significantly lowered the standards of intellectual products such as articles, books, etc., for they are now being produced also by “the masses”.
.